MOSCOW, August 24, 2007 In view of the completion of the "Arctic 2007" research expedition, Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) presents information concerning the purposes that Russians think the expedition pursued; how important it is now for our country to study and develop the Arctic; whether it is worthwhile to invest money into it and what the prospects Russia has in obtaining a decent part of the arctic territories.
Two thirds of Russians (68%) are to some degree informed of the expedition, including 28% who mentioned that they know about the expedition, and 40% who have heard something about it. Residents of Moscow and Saint Petersburg are best informed of the expedition (every second respondent here, 48%, know about the expedition), residents of the rural area are the least informed of the issue (21%).
The opinions of Russians about the purpose of the "Arctic -2007" expedition split into three nearly equal parts: 32% of respondents assume that the purpose was scientific, i.e. to study the Arctic; 30% consider the expedition to have pursued a political purpose, i.e. to struggle for the influence in the region; 27% of respondents identify an economic purpose, i.e. natural resources development. Supporters of the party "United Russia" are more in favour of the "scientific" version (35%), the voters of the Communist party, KPRF think more of the "political" one (48%), whereas the supporters of LDPR and "Fair Russia" consider the expedition to have pursued an economic purpose (35% and 44%).
70% of respondents assume that it is now important to study and develop the Arctic; 15% disagree with them on the issue. The higher the level of education of respondents was, the more vital the issue seemed to them. The share of those, who consider it important, grows from 54% in the group of respondents with elementary education to 77% in the group with higher and uncompleted higher education.
The absolute majority of respondents, 69%, agrees with the fact that there is a need for state financing of the development of the Artic. This number includes 43% who propose to limit the volume of this financing, and 26% consider that we should invest as much as it is needed. Only 18% identify that it would be better to spend the money on other purposes.
The share of respondents supporting unlimited financing of the Arctic projects increases from 17% in the group with elementary education to 33% in the group with higher and unfinished higher education. Supporters of moderate expenditures into the development of the Arctic prevail in all groups, irrespective of the level of education.
Russia should pursue a certain unchanging course in the struggle for its sector of the Arctic for its subsequent economic development to its advantage, as 44% of respondents identify. Less popular are points of view that although the division of the Arctic is desirable, it is better to put it off till the distant future if there arises a conflict situation with the neighbors of the Arctic region, (16%), or that the division of the Arctic is not necessary, it must be acknowledged as a territory with international status (18%). Every second respondent (46%) among the supporters of the President of our country speaks in favour of the division of the Arctic. Among the respondents, who do not approve of V.Putin's political activity those, who are for the decisive division and who are categorically against it are nearly equal in number (31-34% for each option).
Nearly half (46%) of respondents note that Russia will be able to defend its rights for obtaining the Arctic territories. Twice as few respondents (23%) assume that Russia will only be able to claim part of the territories in question. There are only 6% of pessimists, who do not believe in the Arctic prospects of Russia. There are more optimists, confident that the situation will be settled in a favourable way for Russia, among the residents of large cities - 52%; this opinion also predominates in medium-size and small cities and the villages - 44-46%. 36% of respondents in the capitals agree with them. 40% of Muscovites and Peterburgers consider real the scenario, according to which Russia should "share" with its neighbors; whereas substantially fewer respondents from other populated areas do - 20-22%.
The All-Russia opinion poll was conducted by VCIOM on August 18-19, 2007. 1600 respondents were interviewed in 153 population areas of 46 regions of Russia. The statistical error does not exceed 3.4%.
A big Russian research expedition „Arctic - 2007" returned home last week having reached the North Pole. Do you know anything or is it the first time that you hear of the expedition? | ||||||
| Total respondents | Type of Settlement | ||||
Moscow and St. Petersburg | More than 500 thousand inhabitants
| 100-500 thousand inhabitants | Less than 100 thousand inhabitants | Villages | ||
I know | 28 | 48 | 32 | 24 | 28 | 21 |
I have heard something | 40 | 35 | 37 | 48 | 37 | 39 |
It ist e first time that I hear of it | 32 | 17 | 30 | 28 | 34 | 38 |
Hard to say | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
What purpose do you think that the expedition pursued? (in % of those who knows or has heard something about the expedition) | |||||
| Total respondents | Political party supporters | |||
"Unified Russia" | Communist Party, KPRF | LDPR | "Fair Russia" | ||
A scientific one - the development of the Arctic | 32 | 35 | 26 | 28 | 21 |
A political one - the struggle for political influence in the Arctic | 30 | 26 | 48 | 28 | 33 |
An economic one - the development of the natural resources of the Arctic | 27 | 29 | 16 | 35 | 44 |
Other | 2 | 3 | 2 | - | - |
Hard to say | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 2 |
To what extent do you think it is now important for Russia to study and develop the Arctic now? | |||||
| Total respondents | Level of Education | |||
Elementary or lower, junior secondary education | Secondary education (school or vocational school) | Post-secondary education (technical school) | Incomplete higher education (no less than 6 semesters), higher education | ||
Very important | 26 | 16 | 23 | 29 | 31 |
More likely important | 44 | 38 | 45 | 43 | 46 |
More likely not important | 12 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 11 |
Not important at all | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Hard to say | 15 | 29 | 18 | 12 | 10 |
Developing the Arctic requires considerable financial investment. Do you think Russia should invest money in it? | |||||
| Total respondents | Level of Education | |||
Elementary or lower, junior secondary education | Secondary education (school or vocational school) | Post-secondary education (technical school) | Incomplete higher education (no less than 6 semesters), higher education | ||
Yes, it should, as much as it is needed | 26 | 17 | 23 | 28 | 33 |
Yes, Russia should invest money, but there should be a certain limit | 43 | 36 | 44 | 42 | 44 |
No, it should not, it is better to spend the money on other goals | 18 | 25 | 18 | 20 | 13 |
Hard to say | 13 | 22 | 15 | 10 | 10 |
Not only Russia but also several other countries (the USA, Canada, Denmark, etc.) are now struggling to obtain arctic territories. How do you think Russia should act in this respect? | ||||
| Total respondents | Approving/not approving of V.Putin's political activity | ||
Approving | Not approving | Hard to say | ||
Russia should pursue a certain unchanging course in the struggle for its sector of the Arctic for its subsequent economic development to its advantage | 44 | 46 | 34 | 40 |
Although the division of the Arctic is desirable, but it is better to put it off until the distant future if there arises a conflict situation with the neighbors, claiming their part of the territory in the Arctic region | 16 | 17 | 14 | 10 |
The division of the Arctic is not necessary and it is not the right time now, the Arctic must be acknowledged as territory with international status | 18 | 17 | 31 | 17 |
Hard to say | 22 | 20 | 21 | 33 |
What prospects to obtain a decent share of the Arctic territories do you think Russia has? | ||||||
| Total respondents | Type of Settlement | ||||
Moscow and St. Petersburg | More than 500 thousand inhabitants
| 100-500 thousand inhabitants | Less than 100 thousand inhabitants | Villages | ||
Russia will be able to defend ist rights for obtaining Arctic territories | 46 | 36 | 52 | 46 | 44 | 45 |
Russia will have to share the territories in question with other countries | 23 | 40 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 20 |
Russia will not be able to obtain a decent share of the Arctic territories | 6 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
Hard to say | 25 | 14 | 22 | 28 | 30 | 28 |