Results of our studies

IN BRIEF

Russians say that Perestroika was necessary but the reforms were implemented awkwardly which resulted in disastrous consequences.

MOSCOW, April 24, 2015. Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) presents the results of the survey describing whether the Russian attitudes towards the 1985-1991 reforms have changed over twenty years, and what the basic consequences of Perestroika are.

Over the recent twenty years the Gorbachev`s perestroika has not been reconsidered: Russians still think that the Gorbachev reforms of 1985-1991 were necessary but the their implementation was bad. As in 1995, today only 14% of Russians think that everything that was intended to do was achieved. At the same time, about half of respondents (51% in 1995 and 56% in 2015) believe that Perestroika failed because it was implemented improperly. Every fifth (21%) is confident that the Perestroika course was inherently wrong. This point of view is shared by supporters of the LDPR and the CPRF (31%, per each group), retired persons (31%) and people with low level of education (29%).

More than half of Russians (55%) are confident that the Perestroika age has had negative effects in Russia (64% in 2002). Elderly respondents cite more negative consequences than younger Russians (67% of those aged over 60 years vs 45-46% of those aged 18-24). They are opposed by 30% of those who think that the reforms that were started thirty years ago have had positive effects on Russian economy.  

Uncertain future (38%), chaos and mess in country`s governance (35%) as well as crisis in ethnic relations (33%) are the main consequences of the Perestroika reforms, according to Russians. One-quarter of them (24%) believe that the reforms weakened the military power of the country. Russians are divided in their opinions regarding the impact of Perestroika on Russian economy: 28% admit that Perestroika has aggravated the economic crisis in the country, 20% say that it provoked economic renewal. The positive consequences of Perestroika involve extending political rights and freedoms (16%), increased political and economic activity of people (14%), strengthening Russia`s position in the world (14%), and national revival of peoples (11%).

The survey was conducted April 4-5, 2015. 1600 respondents were interviewed in 132 communities in 46 regions of Russia. The margin of error does not exceed 3.5%.

Which of the following statements about Perestroika do you most agree with?

 (closed-ended question, one answer)

 

1995

2010

2013

2015

The reforms were necessary; it was a good decision

14

16

12

14

The reforms were necessary but they were carried out awkwardly, this is why they did more harm than good

51

48

48

56

It was a mistake from the very beginning

25

24

30

21

Don`t know

9

13

10

9

In your opinion, did the Perestroika epoch bring about more good or more harm to Russia in historical perspective? (closed-ended question, one answer)

 

2002

2005

2010

2013

2015

More good

20

27

26

21

30

More harm

63

54

53

59

55

Don`t know

17

20

21

20

15

Can you mention the consequences of the reforms started in April 1985?

 (closed-ended question, not more than five answers)

 

1995

1996

1998

1999

2000

2010

2015

Growing uncertainty about the future

51

48

49

59

50

46

38

Growing chaos and mess in country`s governance

62

52

52

66

52

35

35

Crisis in ethnic relations

38

31

35

38

34

30

33

Deepening economic crisis

37

27

36

53

38

23

28

Weakening military capacities of the country

31

24

29

46

32

21

24

Beginning of the economic  renewal of the country

9

11

13

7

9

21

20

Extending political  rights and freedoms

12

10

14

12

11

17

16

Increasing political and economic activities of people

11

10

10

10

10

14

14

Strengthening the position of the country in the international arena

8

6

6

2

4

18

14

National revival of the peoples of the country

9

6

5

5

4

11

11

Other

2

<1

1

2

1

2

1

Don`t know

-

7

9

2

11

13

15

Note: Using materials from the site www.wciom.ru or wciom.com, as well as distributed by VCIOM, the reference to the source (or hyperlink for the electronic media) is obligatory!

Read the article in Russian