Every third Russian does not know about the population census; every fourth would lie to census taker.
MOSCOW,October21, 2010.Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) presents the data describing, whether Russians understand what the census is intended for, and how honest they are when answering the questions of the census taker.
Most of Russians understands what the national population census is intended for; however, the number of such respondents has considerably decreased over the recent eight years (from 84 to 71%).The purpose of conducting the population census is known first for those respondents with high level of education (78%), residents of big and middle-sized cities (75-78%). At the same time, the share of those who know about that by hearsay has dramatically increased (from 14 to 26%). As a rule, they are Russians with low level of education (35%), and Muscovites and St.Petersburgians (34%).
The majority of Russians think that the national census is intended for getting statistical data about the population and its structure (55%).Thirty-eight percent of respondents think that the data acquired during the census will be used in making policy. In particular, 15% consider the population census will help identify social and economic situation in the country and increase the effectiveness of social policies and politics (10%), serve as a basis for economic and social forecasting (8%) and et cet. Those, who think the population census covers money laundering or is used against population, are in the minority (1% for each).
To reveal whether Russians provide reliable information about themselves, they were asked indirect question how honest they think people are when answering the census questions as people tend to attribute their behavior to other people.In Russians` opinion, people tend to provide reliable information about themselves (61%); it allows us to assume that most of respondents report true information.Most of them are residents of the Urals (74%), big and middle-sized cities (64-66%), non-qualified workers (69%) and specialists with higher education diplomas outside production (73%). One-quarter of respondents, in their turn, think that people conceal information about themselves (25%). Most of them are Southerners (43%), metropolitan residents (32%), entrepreneurs (39%), civil servants (34%) and the unemployed (36%).
The initiative Russian opinion polls were conducted in 16-17 October, 2010. 1600 respondents were interviewed at 138 sampling points in 46 regions of Russia. Themarginoferrordoesnotexceed3.4%.
2002 | 2010 | |
Heard and know what it is for | 84 | 71 |
Heard but do not know what it is for | 14 | 26 |
I have not heard about that | 1 | 1 |
Hard to tell | 1 | 2 |
Total respondents | Education | ||||
elementary, or lower, incomplete secondary education | secondary(school, technical college) | secondary special (college) | incomplete higher (not less than 3 years), higher | ||
Heard and know what it is for | 71 | 61 | 69 | 71 | 78 |
Heard but do not know what it is for | 26 | 35 | 29 | 26 | 20 |
I have not heard about that | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Hard to tell | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
To get the accurate statistical data about the population and its structure | 55 |
To identify social and economic situation in the country | 15 |
To increase the effectiveness of social policies: accrual of social benefits, construction of kindergartens, schools, hospitals | 10 |
For social and economic forecasting | 8 |
Formationofstatebudget | 3 |
Increase of effectiveness of employment policies | 2 |
Money laundering | 1 |
Tousetheinformationagainstpopulation | 1 |
Hard to tell | 12 |
Total respondents | Type of settlement | |||||
Moscow and St.Petersburg | More than500thousand | 100 - 500thousand | Less than100thousand | Rural area | ||
Rather true | 61 | 55 | 64 | 66 | 59 | 58 |
They would rather conceal the information | 25 | 32 | 24 | 22 | 27 | 24 |
Hard to tell | 14 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 18 |
Note: Using materials from the site www.wciom.ru or wciom.com, as well as distributed by VCIOM, the reference to the source (or hyperlink for the electronic media) is obligatory!