Results of our studies

MOSCOW, April 04, 2008Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) presents information on whether Russians consider the court to be an effective means of protection for the rights of citizens and what they assume stands in the way of the courts and prevents them from working with the citizens’ appeals more effectively.The main source of information as far as the work of courts is concerned is central television, as 42% of respondents identify. Other sources mentioned are communicating with friends, relatives, acquaintances (26%); local television (23%), local media (19%). The smallest group of respondents (9-10% for each option) turn to the national press in their search of information on the work of courts or make use of the grapevine (at shops, markets and means of public transportation, etc.).9% speak of having personal experience of applying to court as the main information source on its work, whereas 5% of respondents had to deal with the judicial system due to an exigency of business or profession.Opinions of Russians concerning efficiency of court in the matters of protecting the rights of citizens spread into nearly equal parts: 36% of respondents indicate that the court is an effective means of protecting their rights, and 38% adhere to the opposite point of view. Every fourth respondent (23%) finds it hard to provide an estimationas far as this issue is concerned.The opinion that courts effectively protect the rights of citizens prevails in villages (42% versus 33%); however, in large industrial centres and especially in Moscow and St. Petersburg the point of view that courts are relatively inefficient is more widespread.31% of Russians mention lack of conscientiousness and bribe-taking of judges among the problems and reasons which prevent the courts from working more effectively. The second in the list of problems, but still lagging far behind the first one is pressure exercised by the authorities, as 23% of respondents identify. Another 19% of respondents associate the inefficient work of courts with imperfections in the legislation. Just as many respondents (19%) assume that is has to do with the high workload in courts. Russians are a little bit less often inclined to see the reasons of inefficient work of courts in influence of the criminal underground (13%) and pressure exercised by the business (11%). A still smaller share of respondents (7% for each option) mentions the negative role of the organizational and technical factors, i.e. insufficient number of judges, insufficient material and technical base, low level of financing of the judicial system.The initiative All-Russia opinion poll was conducted by VCIOM on November 3-4, 2008. 1600 respondents were interviewed each time in 153 population areas of 46 regions of Russia. The statistical error does not exceed 3.4%.   

How do you most often receive information on the work of courts? (up to three options; in % of those who are more or less informed of the work of courts)

National television

42

Communicating with friends, relatives, acquaintances

26

Local television

23

Local press, newspapers

19

National press

10

I have made the personal experience of taking it to court

9

The grapevine (at the market, in a shop, in public transport)

9

I have to deal with the judicial system due to a professional necessity

5

Local radio

4

The Internet

2

Other option

1

I am not interested in it

6

Hard to say

4

Do you think that the court is an effective means of protecting the rights of citizens?

 

Total respondents

Type of settlement

Moscow and St. Petersburg

Over 500 thousand residents

100-500 thousand residents

Fewer than 100 thousand residents

Villages

Yes, I do think so

36

29

34

36

31

42

No, I do not think so

38

46

41

39

36

33

Other option

3

10

1

2

4

2

Hard to say

23

15

24

23

29

23

What do you think stays in the way of the courts’ working more effectively with the citizens’ appeals? (up to three options)

Lack of conscientiousness, bribe-taking of judges

31

Pressure exercised by the authorities

23

High workload

19

Imperfections in the legislation

19

Pressure exercised by representatives of the criminal underground

13

All the issues mentioned are topical for the work performance of courts

12

Pressure exercised by the government

11

Insufficient material and technical base for courts

8

Insufficient number of judges

7

Pressure exercised by the law machinery

7

Lack of financing for the judiciary

7

There is nothing that stands in their way, the courts are working relatively effectively

3

Other option

1

Hard to say

16


Read the article in Russian