Russians consider the Kuril Islands dispute settled and oppose their transfer to Japan.
MOSCOW, January 28, 2019. Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) presents the data of a study devoted to the attitudes of Russians towards the return of the Kuril Islands to Japan.
Most of Russians (79%) are aware that Japan wants the return of four southern Kuril Islands.
Three-quarters (77%) of respondents oppose the transfer of the islands to Japan. They say that the issue is solved and the islands belong to Russia (29%). Every tenth (10%) states that Russia won back these islands. Fourteen percent of respondents say that the southern Kuril Islands should be transferred to Japan in order to sign a peace treaty between the two countries (7%).
More and more Russians think that Russia should negotiate with Japan on the Kuril Islands for as long as needed to come to a mutual decision (an increase from 35% in 2009 to 51% in 2018). A minority supports hasty signing of peace treaty which would possibly harm Russia’s interest as well as termination of cooperation with Japan on this issue (13%, for each).
VCIOM-Sputnik survey was conducted on November 26, 2018. The survey involved 1,600 Russians aged 18 and over. The survey was telephone-based and was carried out using stratified dual-frame random sample based on a complete list of landline and mobile phone numbers operating in Russia. The data were weighted according to selection probability and social and demographic characteristics. The margin of error at a 95% confidence level does not exceed 2.5%. In addition to sampling error, minor changes in question wording and different circumstances arising during the fieldwork can introduce bias into the survey.
The 2009 results are based on household surveys.
| Are you aware that Japan seeks to return four southern Kuril Islands from Russia? (closed-ended question, one answer, % of total respondents) | |
| 
 | Total respondents | 
| Yes, I am aware | 79 | 
| No, I am not aware | 20 | 
| Don’t know | 1 | 
| In your opinion, should Russia transfer the southern Kurils to Japan aiming to sign a peace treaty and develop bilateral cooperation? (closed-ended question, one answer, % of total respondents) | |
| 
 | Total respondents | 
| Definitely yes | 4 | 
| Likely yes | 10 | 
| Likely no | 31 | 
| Definitely no | 46 | 
| Don’t know | 9 | 
| In your opinion, why is it important to transfer the southern Kurils to Japan? (open-ended question, up to three answers, % of those who consider that Russia should transfer the southern Kurils to Japan; shown are answers of at least 1% of respondents) | |
| 
 | % of those who consider that Russia should transfer the southern Kurils to Japan | 
| Relations with Japan are important; peace treaty is necessary/opportunity to build mutually beneficial relations | 7 | 
| Being part of Japan these islands will be developing/Islanders wild live better | 2 | 
| These islands initially belonged to Japan | 1 | 
| Opportunity to establish economic cooperation/exchange of technologies/Russian economy will improve | 1 | 
| We do not need these islands: there is no benefit/we do not use them | 1 | 
| We have a large territory; Japan does not have too much land and is overpopulated | 1 | 
| We can sell the islands and gain benefit | 1 | 
| Other | 1 | 
| Don’t know | 2 | 
| In your opinion, why should Russia not transfer the Southern Kurils to Japan? (open-ended question, up to three answers, % of those who consider that Russia should not transfer the Southern Kurils to Japan; shown are answers of at least 1% of respondents) | |
| 
 | % of those who consider that Russia should NOT transfer the southern Kurils to Japan | 
| The dispute is solved; the islands belong to Russia | 29 | 
| We won these islands back | 10 | 
| Russia should not lose its territory | 7 | 
| This may launch an irreversible process of boundaries revision | 7 | 
| Those islands is strategically important | 5 | 
| There is a risk that the U.S.A could establish NATO bases there | 5 | 
| It is a rich area | 4 | 
| Russians live there | 2 | 
| Distrust towards Japan | 2 | 
| We need to keep on negotiating/possible transfer of islands under a lease agreement | 2 | 
| There is no peace treaty and there will not be any peace treaty | 2 | 
| The area is too big | 0 | 
| Partial transfer is possible | 0 | 
| Other | 1 | 
| Don’t know | 16 | 
| In your opinion, what policy should Russia pursue in negotiations on the Kuril Islands? (closed-ended question, one answer, % of total respondents) | ||
| 
 | 2009 | 2018 | 
| Keeping on negotiating with Japan even if it takes time; the most important thing is to come to a mutual agreement | 34 | 51 | 
| Ending the negotiation as soon as possible to get the dispute resolved even if the final decision is contradictory | 14 | 13 | 
| Stopping negotiation with Japan, ignoring Japanese requirements and proposals | 25 | 13 | 
| Postponing the negotiation for 15 to 20 year leaving it for future generations | 10 | 15 | 
| Don’t know | 17 | 8 | 
Note: Using materials from the site www.wciom.ru or wciom.com, as well as distributed by VCIOM, the reference to the source (or hyperlink for the electronic media) is obligatory!
